Volk Construction Co. v. Wilmescherr Drusch Roofing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the UFTA did not provide \express statutory authorization . . . for the award of attorney's fees\
• concluding catch-all provision \expressly grants courts the authority to employ the full array of remedial measures\ and does not evidence an intent to prohibit punitive damages
• concluding catch-all provision “expressly grants courts the authority to employ the full array of remedial measures” and does not evidence an intent to prohibit punitive damages
• finding fraud when defendant filed falsified UCC forms purporting to create a security interest in the assets of an insolvent corporation
• allowing punitive damages and attorney fees under the Missouri UFTA
• same under Mis- souri’s UFTA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).