Skip to main content
· 9/29/1988

Voliva v. Seafarers Pension Plan

Citations

  • 858 F.2d 195
  • 1988 WL 99283

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that courts have the authority to order dismissal of an action for failure to comply with court orders
  • holding that district court’s dismissal following an explicit and reasonable warning was not an abuse of discretion
  • holding that district court’s dismissal following an explicit and reasonable warning was not an abuse of discretion
  • holding that district court’s dismissal following an explicit and reasonable warning was not an abuse of discretion
  • recognizing that courts have “the power to order dismissal of an action for failure to comply with court orders’
  • holding that district court’s dismissal following an explicit and reasonable warning was not an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murnaghan, Sprouse, Winter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.