District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/31/1968
Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc.
Citations
- 212 So. 2d 906
- 28 A.L.R. 3d 1405
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a dancing school had a duty to disclose the whole truth where its client was in an inferior position to know whether her skills were improving
- “Even in contractual situations where a party to a transaction owes no duty to disclose facts within his knowledge or to answer inquiries respecting such facts, the law is if he undertakes to do so he must disclose the Whole truth.”
- “Even in contractual situations where a party to a transaction owes no duty to disclose facts within his knowledge or to answer inquiries respecting such facts, the law is if he undertakes to do so he must disclose the Whole truth.”
- “[W]here a party to a transaction owes no duty to agreed to enter into and perform under the [Settlement] Agreement (either at all or as drafted), and its resulting conduct undertaken herein, had [Elite] known the truth regarding each of these actually false statements.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pierce
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- J. Edward Day v. William H. AveryD.C. Circuit· 1977-04-25· cited 72×
- Garcia v. Chrysler Group LLCS.D. New York· 2015-09-01· cited 60×
- William P. Bissett, Jr., Cross-Appellants v. Ply-Gem Industries, Inc., Cross-AppelleesFifth Circuit· 1976-06-09· cited 59×
- Gutter v. WunkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-01-12· cited 35×
- Amazon v. DavidsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-10-22· cited 32×
- Taylor v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.M.D. Florida· 1983-01-17· cited 24×
- Nicholson v. KellinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-12-12· cited 23×
- Clark v. Roberto's, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-10-03· cited 14×
- Lowe v. Roberto's, Inc. (In Re Roberto's, Inc.)S.D. Florida· 1982-03-19· cited 13×
- CHARLES W. GRIMES & BRENDA GRIMES v. KEVIN R. LOTTESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-02-09· cited 9×
- CAREFREE VILLAGES v. Keating Properties, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-05-07· cited 7×
- Nourachi v. First American Title Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-06· cited 7×
- Grooms v. RoyceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-06-17· cited 6×
- Cafaro v. ZoisEleventh Circuit· 2017-05-23· cited 5×
- Thiele v. DavidsonM.D. Florida· 1977-11-16· cited 3×
- Artec Group, Inc. v. Chugach Management Services, Inc.M.D. Florida· 2006-12-21· cited 3×
- Vertes v. G a C Properties, Inc.S.D. Florida· 1972-01-26· cited 1×
- Bal-Fel, Inc. v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1973-12-12· cited 1×
- Jarzem v. BierhausDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-06-09
- Deprince v. Starboard Cruise Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-01-17
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ramel v. Chasebrook Construction CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1961-11-22· cited 82×
- Kutner v. KalishDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1965-04-13· cited 38×
- Hirschman v. Hodges, O'Hara & Russell Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 1910-01-15· cited 29×
- Beagle v. BagwellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-11-17· cited 16×
- Tonkovich v. South Florida Citrus Industries, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-04-20· cited 12×
- Kitchen v. LongSupreme Court of Florida· 1914-02-03· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.