Skip to main content
· 10/13/1994

Voit v. Allen County

Citations

  • 634 N.E.2d 767
  • 1994 WL 174858

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that highway department engaged in systematic process for determining what improvements would be made to highways, a policy-making decision that would receive discretionary function immunity
  • allegations of a failure to update, improve, or modernize a roadway directly implicate the discretionary function immunity provision of the ITCA
  • I.C. 34-4-16.5-3(16) is not applicable and will not serve as a basis for granting immunity when plaintiffs seek improvements to the current design of a highway and do not allege defects in the original design
  • citing, inter alia, Peavler, 528 N.E.2d at 46

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garrard, Staton, Friedlander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.