Voisin v. Jewell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the \traditional\ arbitrary or capricious standard of review to a claim for TSGLI benefits
• “The Court cannot discern from the conclusory statements in the record why the Board discounted the affidavit of Hensley’s wife, which if fully credited would establish his claim for TSGLI benefits.”
• “[A]s other courts have held in TSGLI cases, the [agency] was justified in attaching little or no weight to Dr. Hopkins’ certification . . . [because] it was made years after the injury on the basis of the medical records alone, not first-hand knowledge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).