Skip to main content
· 11/26/1980

Voirol v. State

Citations

  • 412 N.E.2d 861
  • 1980 Ind. App. LEXIS 1799

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the mere fact that a defendant was willing to sell drugs to a person he did not know could not be construed as evidence that the defendant was “willing and eager” to sell drugs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Young, Chipman, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.