Skip to main content
· 2/11/1992

Void v. State

Citations

  • 601 A.2d 124
  • 325 Md. 386
  • 1992 Md. LEXIS 22

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming that trial judges are afforded “broad discretion in the conduct of trials in such areas as the reception of evidence”
  • affirming that trial judges are afforded \broad discretion in the conduct of trials in such areas as the reception of evidence\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eldridge, Rodowsky, McAuliffe, Chasanow, Karwacki and Robert M. Bell, Jj., and Charles E. Orth, Jr., Judge of the Court of Appeals of Md. (Retired), Specially Assigned

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.