Vogt v. Seattle-First National Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “particular practice” must be found to be “specifically permitted”
• “The exemption applies only if the particular practice found to be unfair or deceptive is specifically permitted, prohibited or regulated” by federal banking regulators.
• “The exemption applies only if the particular practice found to be unfair or deceptive is specifically permitted, prohibited or regulated” by federal banking regulators.
• “Exemption under the Consumer 12 ||Protection Act is applied only after determining whether the specific action is permitted, 13 prohibited, regulated or required by a regulatory body or statute.”
• construing the scope of the exemptions under the CPA
• construing the scope of the exemptions under the CPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).