Vogt v. Carriage Hills Golf Club

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employee does not have a negligent-investigation claim, in part, because of the at-will employment relationship
• concluding that there was no viable claim for a “negligent investigation” prior to terminating the security officer
• holding that an employer’s statement of the reasons for an employee’s discharge to the Maryland agency formerly charged with issuing unemployment benefits was subject to the qualified privilege under this statute
• stating that the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress is “difficult to satisfy”
• explaining that the tort of IED.is.“rigorous, and difficult to satisfy”
• following McLaughlin, below, and declining to recognize substantial public policy of self-defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).