Skip to main content
· 8/11/1964

Vogel v. Fetter Livestock Company

Citations

  • 394 P.2d 766
  • 144 Mont. 127
  • 1964 Mont. LEXIS 121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reiterating that “the per diem argument is used for illustrative purposes,” and recommending that the trial court “instruct the jury that any remark of counsel not sustained by the evidence is to be disregarded.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Castles, Harrison, Doyle, Adair

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.