Voellinger v. Kirchner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claimant’s violation of employer’s attendance policy due to debilitating medical condition subjected claimant to discharge, but such did not disqualify employee from unemployment compensation because employee was discharged through no fault of his own
• holding that “discharge for excessive absenteeism pursuant to an attendance policy analyzed under subsection (d)(2) does not . . . require . . . individualized analysis, but instead looks only to the reasonableness of the [employer’s] rule”
• requiring “an assessment of whether under the totality of the circumstances the claimant’s violation of the employer’s rule was volitional.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).