Vlcek v. Illinois

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an order was not final when it “permit[ted] reinstatement and contemplate[d] the possibility of future proceedings”
• remanding with clarified instruction where district court misunderstood the appellate court’s original remand instructions
• “Our reference to the Lorain plant at the beginning of the opinion was not intended as a definition of the Fund [which one party asserts narrowed the issue on remand] — but rather as a description of the participants who had initiated the suit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).