Vladimir Podio v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the IJ violated applicant’s due process rights by refusing to allow him to testify fully and excluding corroborating testimony
• concluding that the applicant was denied a fair hearing where the immigration judge frequently interrupted and took over questioning
• reversing a BIA ruling on due process grounds where alien “was not allowed to complete his testimony or to present corroborating witnesses” (citing Gentry v. Duckworth, 65 F.3d 555, 559 (7th Cir. 1995
• IJ refused to allow asylum applicant’s siblings to testify that Ukrainian police were looking for him.
• excluded testimony would have 16 No. 06-1550 corroborated facts rejected by the IJ as uncorroborated
• IJ refused to allow asylum applicant’s siblings to testify that Ukrainian police were looking for him.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).