Vivian Burke-Fowler v. Orange County Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, to establish a Title VII discrimination claim, a plaintiff must show, in part, that \her employer treated similarly situated employees who are not members of the plaintiff's class more favorably\
• noting that “[djiffer-ent types and degrees of misconduct may warrant different types and degrees of discipline”
• holding plaintiff failed to establish prima facie case of race discrimination because she did not identify comparator or present other circumstantial evidence suggesting race discrimination
• stating that a plaintiff must show only that her “employer treated similarly situated employees outside her protected class more favorably than she was treated”
• noting that two lines of cases developed interpreting the “similarly situated” prong, and holding that we are bound by the “earliest case” doctrine to use the “nearly identical” standard
• listing four elements for a Title VII disparate treatment claim: “(1) [the plaintiff] is a member of a protected class[,] (2) she was subjected to an adverse employment action[,] (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).