Skip to main content
· 1/26/2010

Vitullo v. Mancini

Citations

  • 684 F. Supp. 2d 747
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6013
  • 2010 WL 331761

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing a claim that notice of a nonjudicial foreclosure notice violated 15 U.S.C. § 1692c(a)(2
  • permitting the addition of a new plaintiff and new claims where there was a clear factual nexus between the new claims and the claim in the original complaint and where the defendant had notice and made no argument that he was prejudiced by the amendments
  • applying the “overshadowing” prohibition to an initial communication phone call
  • “the communications must be examined as whole, not sentence-by-sentence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: T.S. Ellis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.