Vitas Healthcare Corp. v. Pearce Financial Group

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ignoring a client’s case for nearly two years after defendants filed a motion to dismiss
• ignoring a client’s case for nearly two years after defendants filed a motion to dismiss
• rejecting appellant’s argument that punishment was excessive and stating that when the Committee’s action was within the range of sanctions for a violation of a provision of the Model Rules, we affirmed the Committee’s decision
• rejecting appellant's argument that punishment was excessive and stating that when the Committee's action was within the range of sanctions for a violation of a provision of the Model Rules, we affirmed the Committee's decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).