· 1/9/2008
Vitanza v. James
Citations
- 938 A.2d 166
- 397 N.J. Super. 516
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing but declining to follow cases in which the court has granted leave to appeal nunc pro tunc even though appeal was fully briefed on the ground that the practice invites disregard of the Rules
- \The grant of interlocutory review is 'highly discretionary' and 'customarily exercised only sparingly.'\ (quoting State v. Reldan, 100 N.J. 187, 205 (1985))
- noting the importance of avoiding piecemeal litigation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Stern, Collester and C.L. Miniman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.