Skip to main content
· 1/9/2008

Vitanza v. James

Citations

  • 938 A.2d 166
  • 397 N.J. Super. 516

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing but declining to follow cases in which the court has granted leave to appeal nunc pro tunc even though appeal was fully briefed on the ground that the practice invites disregard of the Rules
  • \The grant of interlocutory review is 'highly discretionary' and 'customarily exercised only sparingly.'\ (quoting State v. Reldan, 100 N.J. 187, 205 (1985))
  • noting the importance of avoiding piecemeal litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Stern, Collester and C.L. Miniman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.