· 1/9/1995
Vitaliano v. California, Franchise Tax Board (In Re Vitaliano)
Citations
- 178 B.R. 205
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2263
- 94 Daily Journal DAR 4200
- 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 345
- 1995 WL 126293
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming trial court ruling that assessable taxes not within the definition of section 523(a)(1)(B) or (C) are allowed priority claims under 507(a)(8)(A)(iii)
- tax claims were priority claims within the meaning of § 507(a)(7)(A) [now 507(a)(8)(A) ] and therefore nondischargeable under § 523(a)(1)(A)
- “[T]he bankruptcy code 24 clearly contemplates that a tax debt must fit into only one of those three subsections in order to obtain priority status.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Russell, Carlson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.