Skip to main content
· 1/9/1995

Vitaliano v. California, Franchise Tax Board (In Re Vitaliano)

Citations

  • 178 B.R. 205
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2263
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 4200
  • 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 345
  • 1995 WL 126293

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming trial court ruling that assessable taxes not within the definition of section 523(a)(1)(B) or (C) are allowed priority claims under 507(a)(8)(A)(iii)
  • tax claims were priority claims within the meaning of § 507(a)(7)(A) [now 507(a)(8)(A) ] and therefore nondischargeable under § 523(a)(1)(A)
  • “[T]he bankruptcy code 24 clearly contemplates that a tax debt must fit into only one of those three subsections in order to obtain priority status.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Russell, Carlson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.