Skip to main content
· 12/18/1987

Viskup v. Viskup

Citations

  • 539 A.2d 554
  • 149 Vt. 89
  • 1987 Vt. LEXIS 586

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that order requiring husband to pay wife $74,350 in three monthly installments was property award not subject to modification
  • stating that property division order is final and not modifiable in most cases
  • “[T]he trial court is not required to make findings of fact and conclusions of law when none are requested.”
  • absent evidence of fraud or coercion, property division in divorce decree is generally final
  • court not required to make written findings when none are requested

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Hill, Peck, Gibson, Barney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.