Skip to main content
· 7/13/1995

Visintine v. Saab Auto. AB

Citations

  • 891 F. Supp. 496
  • 1995 WL 416243

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant must prove amount in excess of jurisdictional requisite to a legal certainty where complaint specifically pleads damages sought by each plaintiff is less than jurisdictional amount
  • to hold that “‘all plaintiffs have a collective interest in the creation of a fund sufficient to punish and deter any alleged misconduct on the part of the defendant’ ... is clearly not what the Supreme Court had in mind in Snyder and Zahn”
  • to hold that “ ‘all plaintiffs have a collective interest in the creation of a fund sufficient to punish and deter any alleged misconduct on the part of the defendant’ ... is clearly not what the Supreme Court had in mind in Snyder and Zahn ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gunn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.