Skip to main content
· 7/1/1857

Visher v. Webster

Citations

  • 8 Cal. 109
  • 1857 Cal. LEXIS 308

Syllabus

<p>Where a note is given with the rate of interest in blank, and the holder inserts therein a sum for interest without the knowledge or consent of the maker, it does not become thereby void.</p> <p>To fill a blank in a note is not an alteration thereof, within the meaning of the rule.</p> <p>The declarations and acts of a vendor before sale, are competent testimony to show a fraudulent intent on his part, in a suit to impeach the sale on the ground of fraud. The case of Landecker v. Houghtaling affirmed.</p>

Judges: Burnett, Murray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.