Vischer Products Co. v. National Pressure Cooker Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “ordinarily an attorney’s determination that there exists a valid judgment may obviate the need for further review of a case file”
• denying motion to dismiss based on attempt to enforce judgment without reviewing case file to determine if party had notice of the assignment
• allowing an FDCPA claim to proceed where the question of meaningful review “turn[ed] on [a] disputed issue of fact” regarding whether or not a plaintiff “received notice of the assignment” of the debt, the absence of which forecloses legal paths to collection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).