Skip to main content
· 6/10/1938

Visceglia v. United States

Citations

  • 24 F. Supp. 355
  • 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1934

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Courts have often found the predominance requirement satisfied despite individual differences in the amount of damages.”
  • “Courts have often found the predominance requirement satisfied despite individual differences in the amount of damages.”
  • “[T]he minimum wage and overtime claims alleged by Plaintiffs are similar to those of the class members and arise from the same allegedly unlawful practices and policies.... Typicality is satisfied despite differences in damages arising from a disparity in injuries among the class members.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bondy, Hand, Woolsey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.