Washington Supreme Court· 4/1/1914

Virtue v. Stanley

Citations

79 Wash. 87
139 P. 764
1914 Wash. LEXIS 1148

Syllabus

<p>Appeal — Decisions Appealable — Interlocutory Orders. An appeal does not lies from an order requiring the defendant to elect between inconsistent defenses, since tbe same is interlocutory and does not determine tbe action or prevent final judgment.</p>

Judges: Mount

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Whitehead v. Stringer
Washington Supreme Court· 1919-04-16· cited 14×
Oliver v. Polson
Washington Supreme Court· 1919-01-09· cited 4×
Hutchinson Co. v. Fahey
Washington Supreme Court· 1917-12-05· cited 1×
Kelly-Springfield Tire Co. v. Lotta Miles Tire Co.
Washington Supreme Court· 1924-05-09

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Pringle v. Pringle
Washington Supreme Court· 1909-09-29· cited 12×
County of Snohomish v. Ruff
Washington Supreme Court· 1896-11-28· cited 9×
State ex rel. Twigg v. Superior Court
Washington Supreme Court· 1904-04-09· cited 8×
Vaktaren Publishing Co. v. Pacific Tribune Publishing Co.
Washington Supreme Court· 1906-01-05· cited 6×
Methow Canal Co. v. Barton
Washington Supreme Court· 1912-12-26· cited 3×
Pettingill v. Anderson
Washington Supreme Court· 1906-03-19· cited 2×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.