Virgo v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where a claimant is discharged from employment, “some ‘bad faith’ willful misconduct on the part of the claimant that caused the discharge has to be established or benefits will not be suspended or will be reinstated.”
• noting “a record in the nature of an expert opinion, diagnosis or one that contains conclusions or impressions are not admissible as a business record unless the person who rendered the opinion is available for cross-examination”
• “Because the [documents] were admitted without objection, they fall within the business record exception and constitute substantial evidence to support a finding that Claimant’s discharge was the result of her ‘bad faith.’”
• “Because the[ documents] were admitted without objection, they fall within the business record exception and constitute substantial evidence to support a finding that Claimant’s discharge was the result of her ‘bad faith.’”
• “[I]t is not essential to produce either the person who made the entries or the custodian of the record at the time the entries were made or that the witness qualifying the business records even has personal knowledge of the facts reported in the business record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).