Virginia Retirement System v. Ricky A. Blair

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where appellant argued for the first time in his appeal to the circuit court that the reports of the Medical Board should not have been considered because they were signed by a social worker rather than a doctor, his argument was waived
• “[I]t is the job of the agency, as factfinder, to resolve [the] conflicts” in the evidence.
• “A failure of a party to raise an issue in the proceedings before the agency prohibits him from raising the issue on appeal.”
• “The existence of evidence in the record supporting a contrary conclusion does not establish that there is not substantial evidence in the record to support an agency’s determination.”
• setting out standard of review for factual findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).