Virginia Poindexter v. Mercedes-Benz Credit

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• confirming that to obtain Rule 56(d) relief, the non-moving party bears the burden of showing how discovery “could possibly create a genuine issue of material fact sufficient . . . to survive summary judgment, or otherwise affect the court’s analysis”
• affirming the district court’s “implicit denial of’ litigant’s Rule 56(d) motion
• affirming the district court’s “implicit denial of” litigant’s Rule 56(d) motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).