Virginia M. Gutting v. Falstaff Brewing Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district court erred in denying plaintiff's motion to withdraw its admissions under Rule 36(b
• concluding that district court erred in denying plaintiffs motion to withdraw its admissions under Rule 36(b
• “[T]he court can, in its discretion, permit what would otherwise be an untimely answer.” (emphasis added)
• “[T]he district court erred in not considering the factors set out in [R]ule 36(b).”
• “[T]he district court erred in not considering the factors set out in [R]ule 36(b).”
• “[T]he district court erred in not considering the factors set out in [R]ule 36(b).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).