Skip to main content
· 2/19/1982

Virginia Lime Company v. Craigsville Distributing Company, Inc.

Citations

  • 670 F.2d 1366
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 21645

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that process sent to an address at which parties regularly correspond by mail and the party serving process reasonably could expect that the process would reach the defendant at that address comports with due process
  • holding that notice requirements were satisfied “when process is sent to the address at which the parties regularly corresponded by mail, and the party serving process reasonably could expect that process would reach the defendant at that address”
  • defendant properly served pursuant to state longarm statute by forwarding of complaint by certified mail, return receipt requested, to a post office box, and default proper when defendant refused to sign for the letter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Field, Butzner, Ervin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.