Virginia L. HOLT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the third Chevron Oil factor to be met “for the same reasons” as the first, since inequity would result from applying the new rule retroactively to the class of litigants who “reasonably relied on this Court’s previous rule”
• also citing Harper 16 but noting that, “[b]ecause the Supreme Court in Schaefer did not apply the new rule it announced 17 to the case at bar, we apply traditional Chevron [Oil Co. v. Huson, 404 U.S. 97 (1971)] analysis 18 here”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).