Virginia Gambale v. Deutsche Bank Ag, Bankers Trust Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that presumptive right is “at its apogee” when the documents at issue were used by parties moving for or opposing summary judgment
• holding that while generally, a “filing in the district court of a stipulation 21 | of dismissal signed by all parties pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii
• holding that dismissal of case does not divest a court of jurisdiction “to dispose of material in its files” or to “modify or vacate its own protective orders”
• holding that confidential settlement amount disclosed during court conference should remain redacted in transcript
• noting that “documents used by parties moving for, or opposing, summary judgment should not remain under seal absent the most compelling reasons”
• recognizing court’s role as “primary representative of the public interest” and its duty to determine whether confidential treatment over “records filed wholesale under seal” is warranted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).