Skip to main content
· 12/7/1995

Virginia Espinoza Guerrero Marcos Albert Guerrero v. William Cummings City of Nyssa

Citations

  • 70 F.3d 1111
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9288
  • 33 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 671
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 16197
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 34228
  • 1995 WL 716874

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an offer of judgment for “reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred ... prior to- the date of this offer in an amount to be set by the court” unambiguously excluded attorney’s fees in preparation of the fee petition
  • “The ‘usual rules of contract construction’ apply to interpreting the terms of a Rule 68 settlement offer in a § 1983 case.”
  • “Because the plain language of the settlement offers limits attorney’s fees to those accrued prior to the date of the offers, the district court did not err in finding that the [plaintiffs] acceptance clearly and unambiguously waived attorney’s fees incurred thereafter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Rymer, Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.