Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that order vacating arbitration award and remanding for “re-evaluation of the entire controversy” was an appealable final order
• holding that where “remand constitutes a re-opening that would begin the arbitration all over again,” even before the same arbitrator, the remand order is appealable
• holding that where “remand constitutes a re- opening that would begin the arbitration all over again,” even before the same arbitrator, the remand order is appealable
• rejecting the argument that whether an order vacating and remanding an arbitration award is final and appealable “should be determined by whether the remand is to the original or a new arbitrator”
• rejecting the argument that whether an order vacating and remanding an arbitration award is final and appealable “should be determined by whether the remand is to the original or a new arbitrator”
• “[T]he Arbitration Act does not supply federal jurisdiction where it does not otherwise exist.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).