Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd. v. British Airways PLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a bundled discount is exclu- sionary “if the competitive product in the bundle [was] sold for a price below average variable cost after the discounts on the monopoly items in the bundle were subtracted from the price of that competitive product”
• \[A]n expert's opinion is not a substitute for a plaintiffs obligation to provide evidence of facts that support the applicability of the expert's opinion to the case.\
• \[A]n expert's opinion is not a substitute for a plaintiff's obligation to provide evidence of facts that support the applicability of the expert's opinion to the case.\
• “[A]n expert’s opinion is not a substitute for a plaintiff ’s obligation to provide evidence of facts that support the applicability of the expert’s opinion to the case.”
• \[A]n expert's opinion is not a substitute for a plaintiff 's obligation to provide evidence of facts that support the applicability of the expert's opinion to the case.\
• summary judgment appropriate on Section 1 and 2 claims because \an expert's opinion is not a substitute for a plaintiff's obligation to provide evidence of facts that support the applicability of the expert's opinion to the case\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).