Virge Tucker, Jr. v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• AU’s finding that claimant was not disabled was not supported by substantial evidence where there was no indication that AU considered the impact of claimant’s nonexertional impairments on his exertional capability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).