Skip to main content
· 5/26/2005

Viray v. State

Citations

  • 111 P.3d 1079
  • 121 Nev. 159
  • 121 Nev. Adv. Rep. 19
  • 2005 Nev. LEXIS 23

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the district court did not abuse its discretion by allowing the State to amend the information to conform to the victim's testimony
  • observing that a juror exercising improper influence on another juror could prejudice the defendant
  • recognizing district court's discretion to address juror misconduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rose, Gibbons, Hardesty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.