· 5/26/2005
Viray v. State
Citations
- 111 P.3d 1079
- 121 Nev. 159
- 121 Nev. Adv. Rep. 19
- 2005 Nev. LEXIS 23
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the district court did not abuse its discretion by allowing the State to amend the information to conform to the victim's testimony
- observing that a juror exercising improper influence on another juror could prejudice the defendant
- recognizing district court's discretion to address juror misconduct
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rose, Gibbons, Hardesty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.