Vira Goldman v. Architectural Iron Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the law is “unclear” an “arbitral decision cannot be said to have exhibited a manifest disregard of the law”
• Even if arbitrator erred in applying governing law, the tribunal cannot be said to have “exhibited a manifest disregard of the law.”
• “Given the deference afforded arbitration decisions, this standard requires more than a mistake of law or a clear error in fact finding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).