· 7/24/1996
Violette v. International Business MacHines Corp.
Citations
- 962 F. Supp. 446
- 7 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 395
- 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21254
- 1996 WL 866120
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[B]ecause discrimination claims are unknown at common law and are solely statutory creations, Plaintiff’s claim is preempted by the [ADA].”
- \A finding of . . . a disability [for social security purposes] estops a plaintiff from claiming he is a 'qualified individual.'\
- “[B]ecause discrimination claims are unknown at common law and are solely statutory creations, Plaintiffs claim is preempted by the [Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Employment Practices Act].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murtha
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.