· 7/1/1853
Vint v. King
Citations
- 28 F. Cas. 1200
- 2 Am. Law Reg. 712
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that findings of intact memory and attention undercut treating physician’s opinion that claimant had a “moderately severe” limitation in that area
- deferring to the ALJ’s reasonable weighing of evidence where there were inconsistencies in the record
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brockenbrough
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.