Skip to main content
· 7/1/1853

Vint v. King

Citations

  • 28 F. Cas. 1200
  • 2 Am. Law Reg. 712

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that findings of intact memory and attention undercut treating physician’s opinion that claimant had a “moderately severe” limitation in that area
  • deferring to the ALJ’s reasonable weighing of evidence where there were inconsistencies in the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brockenbrough

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.