· 8/27/1987
Vinson v. Superior Court
Citations
- 740 P.2d 404
- 43 Cal. 3d 833
- 239 Cal. Rptr. 292
- 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 727
- 1987 Cal. LEXIS 401
- 43 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 37,301
- 44 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1174
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a “simple sexual harassment claim asking for compensation for having to endure an oppressive work environment or for wages lost following an unjust dismissal would not normally create a controversy regarding the plaintiff’s mental state”
- discussing differences between combined tort and Title VII suit and “pure” Title VII suit for purposes of Rule 35(a) and its California counterpart
- state rule expressly permits presence of observer at examination
- state rule expressly permits presence of observer at examination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mosk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.