Skip to main content
· 8/27/1987

Vinson v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 740 P.2d 404
  • 43 Cal. 3d 833
  • 239 Cal. Rptr. 292
  • 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 727
  • 1987 Cal. LEXIS 401
  • 43 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 37,301
  • 44 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1174

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a “simple sexual harassment claim asking for compensation for having to endure an oppressive work environment or for wages lost following an unjust dismissal would not normally create a controversy regarding the plaintiff’s mental state”
  • discussing differences between combined tort and Title VII suit and “pure” Title VII suit for purposes of Rule 35(a) and its California counterpart
  • state rule expressly permits presence of observer at examination
  • state rule expressly permits presence of observer at examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mosk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.