Vinson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The defendant is entitled to require the election before he introduces any proof so that he can meet by his proof the evidence upon which the [S]tate relies.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Burlison v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1973-11-19· cited 185×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1991-09-11· cited 144×
• Webster v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1967-11-27· cited 95×
• State of Tennessee v. Michael Smith
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2016-06-24· cited 91×
• STATE of Tennessee v. Courtney KNOWLES
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2015-07-31· cited 78×
• Raine v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1920-12-15· cited 49×
• Dykes v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1956-12-07· cited 25×
• Wilkerson v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1961-07-26· cited 24×
• Upchurch v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1925-12-06· cited 22×
• State v. Beard
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1991-06-25· cited 19×
• Johnson v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1925-12-06· cited 12×
• Peters v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1948-12-11· cited 11×
• Watson v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1933-06-24· cited 6×
• Nash v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1934-03-10· cited 4×
• Cox v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1954-07-23· cited 4×
• Anderson v. Love
  M.D. Tennessee· 1987-03-19· cited 2×
• Cotten v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1949-06-18

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sykes v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1903-12-15· cited 42×
• Jamison v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1906-04-15· cited 33×
• Holt v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1891-10-03· cited 16×