Skip to main content
· 11/29/1993

Vinson & Elkins, J. Evans Attwell, Tax Matters Partner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Citations

  • 7 F.3d 1235
  • 17 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1601
  • 72 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6678
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 31000

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a goal of the best-estimate test is to ensure that the “assumptions truly came from the plan actuary” and were not “chosen by plan management for tax planning or cash flow purposes”
  • explaining the determination of which mortality table was to be used in determining pre-retirement death benefits versus post-retirement annuities
  • explaining the determination of which mortality table was to be used in determining pre-retirement death benefits versus post-retirement annuities
  • “The statute refers to the actuary’s best estimate, not that of a court or of outside experts.”
  • “Congress intended to give actuaries some leeway and freedom from second- guessing.”
  • interpreting identical language in 26 U.S.C. § 412(c)(3)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sneed, Garza, Jolly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.