· 11/29/1993
Vinson & Elkins, J. Evans Attwell, Tax Matters Partner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Citations
- 7 F.3d 1235
- 17 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1601
- 72 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6678
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 31000
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a goal of the best-estimate test is to ensure that the “assumptions truly came from the plan actuary” and were not “chosen by plan management for tax planning or cash flow purposes”
- explaining the determination of which mortality table was to be used in determining pre-retirement death benefits versus post-retirement annuities
- explaining the determination of which mortality table was to be used in determining pre-retirement death benefits versus post-retirement annuities
- “The statute refers to the actuary’s best estimate, not that of a court or of outside experts.”
- “Congress intended to give actuaries some leeway and freedom from second- guessing.”
- interpreting identical language in 26 U.S.C. § 412(c)(3)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sneed, Garza, Jolly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.