Vinnie v. Henry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Knappton was not entitled to compensation for pilings damaged by government’s building of a dam because the pilings and dikes were built under permits revocable at will and thus there was no property interest under the Fifth Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).