Vining v. KIMOTO USA, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• offending party had an opportunity to present legal justification or mitigating circumstances at hearing on motion to compel, so a hearing on the motion for sanctions resulting from a violation of the order compelling discovery was unnecessary
• offending party had an opportunity to present legal justification or mitigating circumstances at hearing on motion to compel, so a hearing on the motion for sanctions resulting from a violation of the order compelling discovery was unnecessary
• appellant had opportunity to present legal justification or mitigating circumstance at hearing on motion to compel, so second hearing unnecessary
• appellant had opportunity to present legal justification or mitigating circumstance at hearing on motion to compel, so second hearing unnecessary
• party had an opportunity to present legal justification or mitigating circumstance at hearing on motion to compel, so second hearing unnecessary
• trial court not required to schedule an additional hearing before determining that party’s failure to comply with discovery order was wilful; party had opportunity to present any justification at hearing on motion to compel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).