Skip to main content

Vines v. Vines

Citations

  • 195 So. 3d 985
  • 2015 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 244
  • 2015 WL 6111837

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering issue of sufficiency of evidence to have been properly preserved by the filing of a posttrial brief despite absence of postjudgment motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Donaldson, Moore, Pittman, Thomas, Thompson, Writing

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.