Vines v. University of Louisiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, under Louisiana law, an appellate overruling of a peremptory exemption is interlocutory and therefore not preclusive
• \[T]he enforcement scheme of Title VII does not terminate the rights of the employee once the EEOC -10- brings a suit.\
• among other prerequisites, “the prior action must have concluded with a final judgment on the merits” in order for the relitigation exception under res judicata to apply
• “There are only three specific circumstances in which a federal court can enjoin a state court proceeding, when it is: (1) expressly authorized by a federal statute; (2) necessary to assert jurisdiction; or (3
• “The doctrine of collateral estoppel applies to prevent issues of ultimate fact from being relitigated between the same parties in a future lawsuit if those issues have once been determined by a valid and final judgment.”
• “There are only three specific circumstances in which a federal court can enjoin a state court proceeding, when it is: (1) expressly authorized by a federal statute; (2) necessary to assert jurisdiction; or (3) necessary to protect or effectuate a prior judgment by a federal court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).