Skip to main content
· 11/15/2007

Vines v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.

Citations

  • 935 A.2d 1078
  • 2007 D.C. App. LEXIS 665
  • 2007 WL 3375470

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that failure to designate the judgment or order being appealed is a jurisdictional defect
  • affirming summary judgment for the defendant where the record showed the plaintiff was given proper notice of foreclosure and the amount necessary to cure her default
  • Vines refused to apply liberal construction to the aspect of Rule 3 that requires a notice of appeal to designate the judgment or order being appealed, but Vines’ reasoning plainly applies to the other exception listed in Rule 3(c)(5) — the specification-of-parties requirement at issue here.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reid, Kramer, Nebeker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.