Skip to main content
· 3/6/2007

Vine v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Citations

  • 916 A.2d 5
  • 281 Conn. 553
  • 2007 Conn. LEXIS 79

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because PCRA did not provide remedy under the PCRA, a claim regarding. extradition raised in a habeas petition was cognizable
  • addressing alternate ground for affirmance not raised at trial because, inter alia, issue was “closely intertwined” with certified question
  • addressing alternative ground for affirmance not raised at trial because, inter alia, issue was “closely intertwined” with certified question
  • addressing alternative ground for affirmance not raised at trial because, inter alia, issue was “closely intertwined” with certified question
  • addressing alternative ground for affirmance not raised at trial because, inter alia, issue was \closely intertwined\ with certified question
  • addressing alternative ground for affirmance that was not raised at trial because, inter alia, issue was ‘‘closely intertwined’’ with certified question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Borden, Palmer, Sullivan, Vertefeuille, Zarella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.