· 9/21/2006
Vine Street Clinic v. HealthLink, Inc.
Citations
- 856 N.E.2d 422
- 222 Ill. 2d 276
- 305 Ill. Dec. 617
- 2006 Ill. LEXIS 1108
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that arguments not raised in either the circuit or appellate court are forfeited
- recognizing that arguments not raised in either the circuit or appellate court are forfeited
- finding that a contention was not properly brought before the court where there was no citation to authority
- recognizing uniqueness of physician-patient relationship, court treated element of reliance in apparent agency analysis differently in health-care context than in other contexts
- refusing to enforce a contract that violated a statutory ban on fee sharing
- failure to cite to relevant authority violates Supreme Court Rule 341(h)(7) (210 Ill. 2d R. 341(h)(7)) and results in forfeiture of the argument
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Karmeier
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.