Vinci v. Waste Management, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that California’s Cartwright Act has “objectives identical to the federal antitrust acts”
• dismissing claims for lack of antitrust standing because “plaintiff was neither a consumer nor a competitor in the market in which trade was restrained”
• plaintiff “was neither a consumer nor a competitor in the market in which trade was restrained”
• “because the Cartwright Act has objectives identical to the federal antitrust acts, the California courts look to cases construing the federal antitrust laws for guidance in interpreting the California act.”
• “The factors identified by the court which favor a finding that the plaintiff is a proper party include the following: (1) the existence of an antitrust violation with resulting harm to the plaintiff; (2) an injury of a type which the antitrust laws were designed to redress; (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).